Editorial: Replicability in Cognitive Science
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Experimenter gender and replicability in science
There is a replication crisis spreading through the annals of scientific inquiry. Although some work has been carried out to uncover the roots of this issue, much remains unanswered. With this in mind, this paper investigates how the gender of the experimenter may affect experimental findings. Clinical trials are regularly carried out without any report of the experimenter's gender and with dub...
متن کاملEditorial: Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
A fundamental problem in cognitive and social science concerns the identification of the principles guiding human cognitive acts such as decision-making, categorization, and behavior under uncertainty. Identifying these mechanisms would have manifold implications for fields ranging from psychology to economics, finance, politics, computer science, and artificial intelligence. The predominant th...
متن کاملEditorial: the evolving partnership between cognitive science and HCI
The theme of this special issue is ‘‘The Role of Cognitive Science in Human – Computer Interaction’’ (HCI) . A generally accepted definition states that the main goal of HCI is to advance the design , implementation , and use of interactive computing systems by human beings (ACM , SIGCHI , 1992) . Since the current primary use of computers is as tools for acting on and for observing the (inform...
متن کاملReplicability is not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science
At various machine learning conferences, at various times, there have been discussions arising from the inability to replicate the experimental results published in a paper. There seems to be a wide spread view that we need to do something to address this problem, as it is essential to the advancement of our field. The most compelling argument would seem to be that reproducibility of experiment...
متن کاملEditorial Protecting Our Science
On 6 June 2013, a court in New York City handed down a decision that calls into question the validity of research that was sponsored by Georgia Pacific (GP) Corporation (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation) and published in eight peer-reviewed articles, including two papers published in the Annals of Occupational Hygiene (Sheehan et al., 2011; Berman et al., 2012). While the court did not d...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Review of Philosophy and Psychology
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1878-5158', '1878-5166']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00531-y